lexicon
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
|
lexicon [2018/03/13 21:50] rayas [care] |
lexicon [2018/03/18 20:19] (current) rayas [hope] |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
| ==== care ==== | ==== care ==== | ||
| - | “On the most general level, we suggest that caring be viewed as a species activity that includes everything that we do to maintain, continue, and repair our ‘world’ so that we can live in it as well as possible. That world includes our bodies, our selves, and our environment, all of which we seek to interweave in a complex, life-sustaining web.” | + | Even though in our societies the independent individual is the most valued, we’re all embedded in interdependent networks of care – whether we acknowledge it or not. In fact, for many these networks – mostly constituted by family and friends – are fundamental as they provide for: |
| - | \\ | + | |
| - | //Fisher, Bernice, and Joan C. Tronto. “Toward a Feminist Theory of Care.” In Circles of Care: Work and Identity in Women’s Lives, edited by Emily K. Abel and Margaret K. Nelson. State University of New York Press, 1990.// | + | |
| + | • Moral support (for example, by listening to each other’s problems and desires, offering comfort in difficult situations, and sharing good moments)\\ | ||
| + | • Social support (for example, by helping out with child care, skills, labour-power)\\ | ||
| + | • Material support (for example, by being granted free or cheap rent, by using other people’s cars)\\ | ||
| + | • Financial support (for example, lending money without interest) | ||
| - | “Caring requires that one start form the standpoint of the one needing care or attention. It requires that we meet the other morally, adopt that person’s, or group’s, perspective and look at the world in their terms.” | + | In networks of care, a constant give and take is key – even if this takes place across different registers. How can we contribute to the development of our own networks of care? How can we make them more inclusive, beyond families and close friends? Can we activate them locally as well as trans-locally? |
| - | \\ | + | |
| - | //Tronto, Joan C. Moral Boundaries: A Political Argument for an Ethic of Care. New York: Routledge, 1993// | + | |
| - | + | via [[http://precaritypilot.net/tool-6-fuelling-networks-of-care/]] | |
| - | \\ | + | |
| - | “Caring involves a notion of doing and intervening. […] Potentially, matters of care can be found in every context; exhibiting them is valuable especially when caring seems to be out of place, superfluous or simply absent. […] What care can mean in each situation cannot be resolved by ready-made explanations. It could be said that introducing care requires critical standpoints that are careful. | + | |
| - | […] | + | |
| - | From this affective perspective, transforming things into matters of care is a way of relating to them, of inevitably becoming affected by them, and of modifying their potential to affect others. […] What is needed to generate more caring relationships?” | + | |
| - | \\ | + | |
| - | //Puig de la Bellacasa, María. “Matters of Care in Technoscience: Assembling Neglected Things.” Social Studies of Science 41, no. 1 (2011): 85–106.// | + | |
| ==== conviviality ==== | ==== conviviality ==== | ||
| Line 51: | Line 45: | ||
| ===== H ===== | ===== H ===== | ||
| + | ==== hope ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | “Hope locates itself in the premises that we don’t know what will happen and that in the spaciousness of uncertainty is room to act. When you recognize uncertainty, you recognise that you may be able to influence the outcomes – you alone or you in concert with a few dozen or several million others. Hope is an embrace of the unknown and the unknowable, an alternative to the certainty of both optimists and pessimists”. | ||
| + | Rebecca Solnit, in The Guardian, 2016 [[https://www.theguardian.com/books/2016/jul/15/rebecca-solnit-hope-in-the-dark-new-essay-embrace-unknown]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | “Critical thinking without hope is cynicism. Hope without critical thinking is naïveté.” - Maria Popova | ||
| ==== hospitality ==== | ==== hospitality ==== | ||
| Line 68: | Line 68: | ||
| ==== negotiation ==== | ==== negotiation ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Working in the cultural realm is an ongoing process of political positioning which engages, though its own mediums, language and discursive site, in the larger forces at work. Negotiation is understood as the opposite of principle. It it the most repressed element of the idea of democracy, as it inevitably contains some compromise, and compromise is usually seen as a declaration of weakness. Negotiation offers a process of articulation, and the acknowledgement of often antagonistic positions in order to come out with productive modes of commonality-a being-in-common towards further dialogues and complexifications. A [[lexicon#support|support]] structure is in a certain sense a questioning structure, a supplement, a somehow external organization, at least with a certain autonomy form the situation it addresses; this allows it to pose, expose and revise questions in relationship to its context and how to operate within it. Support is negotiation, not the application of principle but a conversation towards something that it does not define. | ||
| + | |||
| + | //Support, participation, and relationships to equity. | ||
| + | Conversation between Celine Condorelli (Support Structure) and Eyal Weizman, August 2007//\\ | ||
| + | [[http://www.supportstructure.org/ss_participation.html]] | ||
| ===== O ===== | ===== O ===== | ||
lexicon.1520974241.txt.gz · Last modified: 2018/03/13 21:50 by rayas
Page Tools
Except where otherwise noted, content on this wiki is licensed under the following license: CC Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International
